Página principal
The effect of office sound on functionality has recently become the topic of much disagreement. Several studies have tried to measure the effect of noise on office operation, but no consensus has been reached. Studies have attempted to test the impact of surrounding noise on levels of fatigue and alertness, however, the results are mixed. A range of investigators report that the outcomes are consistent across a high number of categories, but decisions are often controversial. A special laboratory test (EQ-i) was developed for the experimental assessment of office noise. The test has been demonstrated to be a reliable tool for quantifying the impact of sound on office productivity.
The EQ-i relies on two components. One component measures the cognitive processing of workplace workers, while another element measures the subjective reaction of office employees to various visual stimuli. The testing procedure is performed in a quiet area with the noise of a personal computer turned away. A battery of tests is done on a specific set of office personnel. A subjective questionnaire is also carried out on each person to obtain information on their working habits and opinions concerning the office environment. After a series of tests are performed on a random sample of office personnel, an average total score is calculated for every person.
Several alternative explanations have been advanced to account for the results of the EQ-i outcomes. Potential explanations are that office employees weren't subjected to enough high intensity or low intensity sound during the testing period, workplace equipment was malfunctioning or inaccurate, or the results were skewed due to several confounding factors. No alternate explanation has yet to be provided that can clarify the results obtained from this test.
A test research was conducted to ascertain the association between ambient temperatures and indoor lighting at a medical setting. Researchers measured indoor lighting at four different points from the office space and found a strong and significant relationship between both. The investigators attributed this connection to the effect of light on employee's moods. Indoor temperature was shown to be negatively related to the mood of office employees according to a statistically significant increase in anxiety levels. The authors concluded that"the current review... indicates that there is a negative relationship between ambient temperature and disposition among office employees."
In another study, researchers examined the effect of red vs. blue light on neurobehavioral testing. They measured neurobehavioral testing in a dimly-lit room and found no real difference in functionality between conditions. However, the researchers stressed the importance of using an proper neurobehavioral testing protocol and performing standardized psychological tests in clinical settings. They also emphasized that more studies must be done to analyze the impact of reduced lighting on neurobehavioral testing.
A third research project attempted to measure the effect of temperature on reaction time in a laboratory setting. Researchers measured reaction time at a dimly-lit space and discovered that the reaction time increased if there was an increase in room temperature. But they worried that this was not a significant impact and has been affected by the presence of different aspects. For instance, a slight increase in temperature decreased the quantity of beta action. Furthermore, the researchers emphasized that the effect of temperature on the response time might have significant consequences for executive function evaluation.
The fourth study project tested the effect of temperature on executive function in an environment with two distinct light-sensitivity levels (daylight or dark). Two office workers, one having a day/night preference and another with a no-light taste, engaged in a task in which their performance was analyzed with a reaction time paradigm. After completing the task, the performance of both office employees was compared. The results showed a substantial principal effect of temperature on the reaction time (p = 0.049). The authors concluded,"A distinct window of temperature benefit may contribute to executive processing rate ." This study demonstrated that fever did really have a positive impact on reaction time as it was controlled for neighboring lightness or darkness.
Overall, these studies confirm the importance of temperature for function performance. Specifically, they show that fever can modulate numerous areas of performance such as attention, mood, alertness, and mental functioning. Office workers are especially susceptible to temperature fluctuations, oo오피스 which is probably due to the inherently challenging nature of the job that involves sitting in front of a computer screen or working with extreme lighting conditions.
To find out more information in regards to 홈페이지이름 look into the web-page.
