Página principal
The impact of office sound on performance has lately become the subject of much disagreement. Several studies have tried to objectively measure the results of noise on office performance, but no consensus was reached. Studies have attempted to test the impact of surrounding noise on levels of fatigue and alertness, but the results are combined. A number of researchers report that the outcomes are consistent across a high number of classes, but decisions are often controversial. A unique laboratory test (EQ-i) was developed for the experimental evaluation of office sound. The evaluation has been demonstrated to be a trusted tool for measuring the effect of noise on workplace productivity.
The EQ-i relies on two elements. One part measures the cognitive processing of office employees, while another element measures the subjective reaction of office employees to various visual stimuli. The testing process is carried out in a quiet room with the noise of a computer turned away. A battery of tests is performed on a specific group of office employees. A subjective questionnaire is also carried out on every individual to receive information on their working habits and opinions about the office environment. After a series of tests are performed on a random sample of office employees, a mean total score is calculated for every person.
Several other explanations have been advanced to account for the results of the EQ-i results. Possible explanations are that office workers were not exposed to enough substantial intensity or low intensity noise throughout the testing interval, workplace equipment was inaccurate, or the results were skewed due to several confounding factors. No alternate explanation has not yet been provided that can clarify the results obtained from this evaluation.
A test research was conducted to ascertain the relationship between ambient temperature and indoor lighting at a health setting. Researchers measured indoor lighting at four different points from the office area and found a strong and significant relationship between the two. The investigators attributed this connection to the effect of light on worker's moods. Indoor temperature was found to be negatively associated with the mood of office employees according to a statistically significant increase in anxiety levels. The authors concluded that"the present review... indicates that there's a negative relationship between ambient temperature and mood among office workers."
In a different study, researchers examined the impact of red vs. blue light on neurobehavioral testing. They measured neurobehavioral testing in a dimly-lit room and found no real difference in functionality between states. However, the researchers stressed the importance of using an proper neurobehavioral testing protocol and performing standardized psychological tests in clinical settings. They also emphasized that more studies should be done in order to analyze the impact of low illumination on neurobehavioral testing.
A third research project tried to assess the effect of temperature on reaction time in a laboratory setting. Researchers measured reaction time in a dimly-lit space and discovered that the reaction time increased if there was an increase in room temperature. However, they stressed that this was not a substantial effect and was affected by the presence of different aspects. For instance, a slight increase in temperature diminished the amount of beta action. What's more, the researchers emphasized that the impact of temperature on the response time could have significant consequences for executive function evaluation.
The fourth study project tested the impact of temperature on executive function in an environment with two different light-sensitivity levels (daylight or dark). Two office workers, one having a day/night preference and the other using a no-light taste, engaged in a task in which their performance was tested using a reaction time paradigm. After finishing the task, the performance of the two office workers was compared. The results demonstrated a significant principal effect of temperature on the reaction time (p = 0.049). The authors concluded,"A different window of temperature benefit may contribute to executive processing speed" This study showed that fever did indeed have a favorable effect on reaction time when it was commanded for neighboring lightness or darkness.
Overall, these studies confirm the significance of temperature for function performance. Specifically, they show that temperature can modulate multiple areas of performance such as attention, mood, alertness, and mental functioning. Office workers are particularly prone to temperature changes, which is probably due to the inherently challenging nature of the work that involves sitting before a computer screen or working with extreme lighting conditions.
If you have any sort of questions relating to where and how you can use 창원오피스, you could call us at our site.
